CONSERVATIVE CRIMINOLOGY
  • Home Page
  • Conservative Criminology
    • Why A Conservative Criminology
    • Principles of Conservative Criminology >
      • Conservative Principles: Science
      • Conservative Principles: Criminal Justice
      • Conservative Principles: Legislation
      • Conservative Principles: Universities
    • Conservative Websites and Books >
      • Conservative Websites
  • Academic Freedom
    • Studies Cited in Our Book
    • Advice To Liberal Students
    • Advice to Conservative Students
    • Conservative Faculty
    • Liberal Faculty
  • CCBlog
  • Who We Are

The Problem is Politics

4/20/2016

Comments

 
Think for a minute about the barriers to effective crime control.  What are they?  Some might point to a lack of resources; too few cops, not enough jail space, not enough money for OT.  Others might point to community factors like the “no snitch” rule found in high crime neighborhoods.  

All of these points are correct but they overlook a key factor: politics.  

​Controlling crime is made almost impossible sometimes.  A mayor doesn’t get along with the police chief, the city manager doesn’t trust the mayor, and the city council is entirely dysfunctional.  

We also cannot lose sight that many other groups are involved in this process.  Civil rights groups have input, as do neighborhood associations, as do businesses, as do some preachers.

What emerges from the input of these various groups are not just competing values and priorities, but values and priorities that are in direct conflict.  Civil rights groups don’t want high crime neighborhoods “over policed,” businesses don’t want their customers arrested or run off, neighborhood associations want more social spending.  And of course, anytime race is brought into the mix, everything stops, lines get drawn in the sand, and intransigence sets in.

​I’ve seen this in Cincinnati and in other places.  It is an under-researched area but it is critically important to understand.  Political roadblocks to effective crime control lead to more crime.  These roadblocks lead to the decline of neighborhoods and to increased victimization.  

I recall vividly the riots that occurred in Cincinnati in 2001.  The politics was toxic.  The city council and the mayor were either ineffective in managing the situation or they were instrumental in facilitating the riots.  Either way, their lack of discipline, their pursuit of political self-interest, and their inability to confront the voices of radicalism and rebellion led to the riots.

​Public safety is the first order of business of government.  Unfortunately, given today’s upside down views on crime and justice, pubic safety takes a back seat to the whims of social justice advocates.  

Comments
comments powered by Disqus

    John Paul Wright and Matt DeLisi

    Professors of Crime and Criminology

    **Views expressed on this blog are ours alone and do not reflect the official views of our respective institutions.

    Tweets by cjprofman

    Archives

    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015

    Categories

    All
    Conservatism
    Crime
    Criminal Justice
    Diversity
    Due Process
    Free Speech
    Ideology
    Intellectual Freedom
    Research

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly